Legal Opinion
Cochrell v. Hiatt
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 22, 1981No. 5200PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
Defendant Hiatt appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs Cochrell in the amount of $3,970.88. The trial court found that Hiatt had breached a valid roofing contract, and it rendered judgment for plaintiffs in an amount equal to the cost to them for installation of a new insulated roof.
Hiatt challenges nine of the court’s findings:
3. On or about June 16, 1976, the Plaintiffs entered into a written contract with Defendant doing business as a sole proprietorship, and whereby the Defendant for the sum of $1,083.00, agreed to renovate Plaintiff’s roof, install…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southern Union Exploration Co. v. Wynn Exploration Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Pillsbury v. BlumenthalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- Mathieson v. HublerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- Constructors, Ltd. v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- Andriola v. MilliganNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Archuleta v. City of RoswellDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Anderson Living Trust v. Conocophillips Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- Newcum v. LawsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Tapia v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Eaton v. MorseMontana Supreme Court · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.