Disharoon v. Eskew
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The petition as amended is not subject to demurrer on the ground that (a) it is duplicitous; or that (b) the agent alleged to have perpetrated the fraud upon plaintiff was “a mere special agent,” or that (e) the allegations of the petition are not sufficient to support the charge of fraud. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the petition. See, as to declarations of a “special agent,” Williams v. Kelsey, 6 Ga. 365, 373. As to allegations of fraud in shortage of land, Leyden v. Hickman, 75 Ga. 684; Seymore v. Rice, 94 Ga. 183 (21 S. E. 293). Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Williams v. Kelsey & HalstedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
- Leyden v. HickmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- Seymore v. RiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
3Cited by1 opinion
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FulfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925