Legal Opinion

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Fulford

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1925No. 15315PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. In this action against a railroad company for the homicide of the plaintiff’s husband, who, when walking on the railroad-track, was struck and killed by the defendant’s locomotive, the petition alleges, not that the defendant’s servants killed him wilfully or wantonly, but that the “agents in charge of the defendant’s locomotive could have discovered the presence and perilous position of petitioner’s husband and avoided killing him,” and that the homicide was negligent. See, in this connection, Thomas v. Georgia Granite Co., 140 Ga. 459 (1) (79 S. E. 130). In such a case, if the decedent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Georgia Granite Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FulfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  3. Biederman v. Montezuma Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Disharoon v. EskewSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. SlatonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  2. Vaughn v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Young v. South Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Leverett v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API