Legal Opinion

Leyden v. Hickman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 22, 1885PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Fraud. Equity. Contracts. Equitable Pleadings. Venue. Jurisdiction. Before Judge Fain. Catoosa Superior Court. February Term, 1885. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Blandeord, Justice.

Hickman brought his action of ejectment to recover a certain tract of land in Catoosa county which he had sold to Leyden, and given his bond for titles, some of the purchase money being unpaid. Leyden pleaded to this action that he was induced to purchase this land by the false and fraudulent representations of Hickman, that the tract of land contained six hundred acres, when, in fact, it only contained a little over three hundred acres; also that a certain portion of the land enclosed under fence near the Catoosa Springs, did not belong to Hickman, and that this in great…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cherry v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  2. Markham v. HuffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kendall v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Whiten v. Orr Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Townsend v. BrinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Ivey v. CowartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Johnson v. GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API