Legal Opinion
Rosillo-Puga v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 15, 2009No. 07-9564PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Martin Rosillo-Puga seeks review of a decision issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), in which the BIA affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of Rosillo-Puga’s motion to reconsider or reopen his deportation proceedings. The IJ, in reliance on regulations implementing the Immigration and Nationalization Act, had ruled that he lacked jurisdiction over the motion because Rosillo-Puga had previously been removed from the United States. After concluding that the regulations are valid, we deny Rosillo-Puga’s petition for review.
BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hamdan v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kerber v. Qwest Group Life Insurance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Luna v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Coyt v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Contreras-Bocanegra v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Prestol Espinal v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.