Legal Opinion

Prestol Espinal v. Attorney General of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 3, 2011No. 10-1473PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

Ramon Prestol Espinal (referred to by the parties as Prestol) petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) that it lacked jurisdiction over Prestol’s motion to reconsider the BIA’s denial of relief because Prestol had been removed from the United States. Prestol’s petition requires us to decide whether the Attorney General’s regulation barring aliens who have been removed from the United States from filing a motion to reconsider and/or reopen, 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(d), otherwise known as the post-departure bar, is…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Sang Goo Park v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. New Mexico v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  3. Contreras-Bocanegra v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. Wilmer Garcia Carias v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  5. J. M. ACOSTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API