Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 22, 1993No. 1 CA-CR 90-869, 1 CA-CR 90-870 and 1 CA-CR 91-171-PRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Judge.

The major issue presented by these consolidated appeals and petition for review of a denial of post-conviction relief is whether defendant’s statements regarding prior bad acts (crimes) are admissible, absent independent proof that the prior bad acts were committed. We hold that they are admissible.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Viewed in the light most favorable to sustaining the jury verdicts, the evidence at trial in Maricopa County cause number CR 90-00708 established that appellant Loil Minor Armstrong (defendant) telephoned an undercover Mesa police officer on…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. State v. AdamsonArizona Supreme Court · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. MataArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. CarapezzaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  3. State v. KrumArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. State of Arizona v. Ramon Escareno MerazCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API