Legal Opinion

State v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 22, 2008No. 95,256PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Rosen, J.:

Jason Cole Hughes appeals his convictions for felony murder and aggravated burglary. Hughes contends the district court erroneously admitted evidence in violation of his constitutional rights and the rules of evidence. This court concludes that prejudicial error occurred in the course of the trial, and the case is remanded for retrial.

Hughes and Marcy Carapezza were charged as codefendants with the homicide of Mary Clark. They were tried separately, and both were convicted and have appealed their convictions. Because the facts are the same…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. BowenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. State v. PeppersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. State v. LowerySupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  5. State v. VasquezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API