Legal Opinion

Arnall v. Newcomb

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 31, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Hunt. Tried below before Hon. H. C. Conner.

1Opinion of the Court

RAINEY, Chief Justice.

The appellants sued in trespass to try-title the appellees and one Frazier to recover the land in controversy. On the trial judgment was rendered for defendants, from which this appeal is prosecuted. The defendants deraign title through Emma A. Arnall, appellant, and it was agreed in effect that title to the land was in her, and she would be entitled to recover unless she was divested of title by virtue of the instruments hereinafter mentioned.

Defendant, over objections of plaintiffs, was permitted to introduce as evidence two conveyances, one bearing date May 2, 1882,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ogden & Johnson v. BosseTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Lyne v. SanfordTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Wilson v. SimpsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Cannon v. BoutwellTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Stephens v. MotlTexas Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Busby v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Guaranty Abstract Co. v. RelfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Smith v. VictoryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Busby v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API