Legal Opinion
Baker v. Keebler
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided September 26, 1939No. 48PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DARR, District Judge.
The controverted question is whether there is a right of removal of this cause from a state court to this court.
The plaintiffs, who later became defendants in a cross action, are trustees in the trust agreement set up under authority of the Bank Conservation Act, U.S.C.A. Title 12, Section 207, and approved by the Comptroller of the Currency, for the purpose of reorganizing the East Tennessee National Bank.
On February 8, 1938, the plaintiffs filed their original bill in the Chancery Court of *556Knox County, Tennessee, in which they sought to have the trust agreement…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Waco v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Wyman v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Mason City & Fort Dodge Railroad v. BoyntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Independent Cotton Oil Co. v. BeachamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Guarantee Co. of North Dakota v. HanwayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arvidson v. Reynolds Metals Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1952
- Bussey v. Seaboard Coast Line RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1970