Legal Opinion

Arvidson v. Reynolds Metals Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided April 7, 1952No. Civ. 1415PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, in an action filed by them in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Southern Division, allege that parcels of real property owned by them, respectively, situate in the State of Washington, have been trespassed upon by the defendant and seek damages because of injury thereto. The trespass was alleged to have ibeen committed by means of gases, fumes, and particulate matter which physically invaded said lands and caused injury. It is alleged that the fumes, gases and particulate- matter were emitted by an aluminum…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Foster-Milburn Co. v. Knight, Chief JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  5. Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Petroleum Financial Corp. v. StoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  2. Fairview Farms, Inc. v. Reynolds Metals CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1959
  3. Ackert v. BryanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. Arvidson v. Reynolds Metals CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1954
  5. Ackert v. van Pelt BryanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API