Legal Opinion

Catalin Corp. of America v. Catalazuli Mfg. Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 18, 1935No. 7299PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALSTON, District Judge.

This, is a patent infringement suit in which infringement is alleged of letters patent No. 1,854,600, granted April 19, 1932, to Fritz Poliak and Alfons Ostersetzer, for an improvement in a method for making phenol-formaldehyde condensation products, and for the product itself. Claims 1, 2, 3, and 5, all method claims, are in issue. The usual defenses of invalidity and non-infringement are asserted.

The specification as originally filed was found objectionable in form and content by the Examiner and led to several requests on the part of the Examiner for clarification.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spalding v. John WanamakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  2. Campbell Metal Window Corp. v. S. H. Pomeroy & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1924
  3. Philadelphia Rubber Works Co. v. United States Rubber Reclaiming WorksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Catalin Corporation of America v. Catalazuli Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  2. Catalin Corp. of America v. SlosseDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1939
  3. Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. Mimex Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API