Legal Opinion

Nowlin v. Scurr

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 16, 1983No. 67544PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDSON, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs Nowlin and Benadum appeal from district court’s decree providing them only partial relief in their mandamus action that alleged they were being deprived of access to the courts. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Plaintiffs’ pro se petition, filed November 21, 1980, alleged they were confined in “Maximum security setting administrative segregation” at Iowa State Penitentiary. They essentially alleged they were being denied meaningful access to the courts by being deprived of ball-point pens, pencils, erasers, hardback or bound lawbooks, use of a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. PflibsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  2. Manning v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1985
  3. Johnston v. LehmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Hawk Eye v. JacksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. Knight v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API