Legal Opinion
Manning v. International Harvester Co.
Court of Appeals of Iowa
Decided November 26, 1985No. 84-1820PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OXBERGER, Chief Judge.
The defendant International Harvester has appealed from the trial court’s award of damages to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs have cross-appealed from denial of recovery from defendant-seller Kunau, and claiming the theory of breach of implied warranty was proven. We affirm the trial court.
The plaintiffs, Laverne Manning and his son, Joseph, purchased an International Harvester 800 Series planter from defendant Kunau Implement Company in the summer of 1980. The planter was ordered to be equipped with a 36-hole seed drum. The planter was delivered in spring of 1981 and Kunau’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nebraska Innkeepers, Inc. v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- RET Corp. v. Frank Paxton Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Martin v. JaekelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Weik v. Ace Rents Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1958
- Northern Natural Gas Company v. Roth Packing Company, Roth Packing Company v. Northern Natural Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,855 Outboard Marine Corporation v. Babcock Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Audio Odyssey, Ltd., an Iowa Corporation Dogan A. Dincer Ann M. Dincer v. United States of America Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Ethyl Corp. v. BP Performance Polymers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Maisel v. GelhausCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1987
- Mudas Greenhouses, LLC v. Global Horticultural, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.