Legal Opinion

Zentgrebe v. Schram

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1939No. 7818Published

1Per curiam

In" an appeal by one of two defendants from a joint decree for deficiency against both, lodged in this court before the effective date of the Rules of Civil Procedure, it appears that there was no summons and severance nor any notice equivalent thereto in respect to the non-appéaling defendant. In this situation it appears that we have no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Oakland County, Michigan, v. Hazlett, 6 Cir., 87 F.2d 795; Preston v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, 6 Cir., 98 F.2d 430. Since the decree is joint in form we may not dis*1023regard the face of the record. Hartford…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Oakland County v. HazlettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  3. Preston v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API