Legal Opinion

Parnau v. Industrial Commission of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1960No. 6834PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

Petitioner, Eva L. Parnau, sustained a compensable injury in an industrial accident on February 10, 1948. Applicant was operated upon and then seen in consultation by the Medical Advisory Board in March of 1950, as a result of which it was determined that she had sustained a 20 per cent general physical functional disability attributable to her injury. On the basis of a further consultation in December of 1950, which found her condition to be stationary requiring no further treatment, the Commission' rendered its final award compensating petitioner for a 25 per cent loss of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McGill v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Caekos v. Stanley Fruit Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Hunter v. Wm. Peper Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Harambasic v. Barrett & Hilp & MacCo Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Gallo v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cammeron v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Cammeron v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Lowry v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Bierman v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Chavarria v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API