Legal Opinion

Leo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 9, 1996No. Civil Action 95-2953PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 9th day of September, 1996, after consideration of the defendant State Farm’s motion for summary judgment, the response thereto and after review of the Report and Recommendation of Diane M. Welsh, United States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. Defendant State Farm’s motion for summary judgment (Document No. 22) is GRANTED with respect to all counts of the complaint.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

WELSH, United States Magistrate Judge.

This is a five count diversity action the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kosierowski v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Bostick v. ITT Hartford Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Quaciari v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Krisa v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Douglas v. Discover Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API