Legal Opinion
Bostick v. ITT Hartford Group, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 27, 1999No. 2:97-cv-06296PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOWELL A. REED, Senior District Judge.
Presently before the court is the motion of defendant ITT Hartford Groups, Inc. (“Hartford”) for summary judgment (Document No. 22) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e), the memorandum of plaintiffs in opposition thereto (Document No. 23) and the reply of Hartford (Document No. 25). Based on the following analysis, the motion of Hartford will be, granted in part and denied in part.
I. Background
In their complaint, the plaintiffs contend that an outside wall of their house collapsed. See Defendants’ Exhibit A, Plaintiffs’ Complaint at…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- J.C. Penney Life Insurance Company v. Christian J. Pilosi James C. PilosiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Benjamin Post v. St Paul Travelers Ins CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Hamm v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Loos Ex Rel. LoosDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Winding Hills v. Na Specialty Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.