Legal Opinion

Russell Stover Candies, Inc. v. Double VV, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided October 30, 1997No. Civil Action No. 97-2144-KHVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VRATIL, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Russell Stover Candies, Inc. brings this action for damages under 49 U.S.C. § 11707, commonly known as the Car-mack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act, for damages to candy-making machines which were damaged in transit from Bremerhaven, Germany to plaintiffs plant in Abilene, Kansas. The matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. #26) filed October 1, 1997. Defendant advances two arguments in support of its motion. First, it argues that the Carmack Amendment does not apply in this case. Second, it…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Belinda MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NANNIE AND THE NEWBORNS, INC.; Business Solutions, Inc.; Larry D. Gudgel, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. Muck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. Underwriters at Lloyds of London v. North American Van LinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Berlanga v. Terrier Transportation, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API