Legal Opinion
City of Meriden v. Rogers
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 5, 1930PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The original action which gave rise to the present proceeding was brought by the present defendant against the city—for injuries upon the public highway wherein the then plaintiff recovered judgment for $2500 damages, and upon appeal that judgment was affirmed by this court. Rogers v. Meriden, 109 Conn. 324, 146 Atl. 735.
Upon the present appeal the sole question presented to us is whether the trial court erred in sustaining the defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, and in rendering judgment for the defendant. This is a question of law as to whether the facts alleged in the complaint and the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- McCulloch v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Wildman v. WildmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Eliot's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- White v. AverySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Stocking v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Corden v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Crook v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Kane v. KaneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Sengebush v. EdgertonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.