Legal Opinion
Crook v. Clarke
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 5, 1938PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
On April 2d, 1936, the plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant and no appeal was taken. On August 22d, 1936, the defendant filed a petition for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence and because the transcript was defective. Affidavits containing the newly discovered evidence and the claimed corrections of the transcript accompanied the petition, as did the transcript of evidence on the first trial. At the hearing these were supplemented by a very limited amount of oral testi mony. Judgment was entered denying the petition and this appeal is from that judgment.
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- Gonirenki v. American Steel & Wire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Apter v. JordanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- City of Meriden v. RogersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Widman v. KearnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dick v. DickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Black v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. Putnam PhalanxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Jacobs v. FazzanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Levine v. Union & New Haven Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.