Legal Opinion

Kane v. Kane

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 5, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAvert, J.

The plaintiff brought this action for divorce upon the ground of intolerable cruelty. The defendant filed an answer denying the allegations of intolerable cruelty and a cross-complaint seeking a divorce on that ground. The case was referred to the Honorable Leonard J. Nickerson, state referee, who, after hearing, rendered a report finding that the defendant, on divers days between June 5th, 1927, and October 20th, 1931, had been guilty of intolerable cruelty to the plaintiff, and that the allegations of the cross-complaint were not proved. Thereafter, the defendant filed a motion to reopen on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swist v. SwistSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. City of Meriden v. RogersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. Jacobs v. JacobsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  4. Kliarsky v. Eastern Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pet Car Products, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  2. Azzolina v. Order of the Sons of ItalySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Stocking v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  4. Corbin v. CorbinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Altman v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API