Legal Opinion
Danielson v. Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 22, 1935No. 13,654PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Butler
While in the employ of A. Danielson and Son, Richard A. Ness sustained an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. He died as a result of that injury. His widow, Hilma, was awarded compensation. The only controversy was, and is, over the construction to he given to section 4421, Compiled Laws, as amended by Session Laws of 1929, page 648, chapter 186, section 2. It provides as follows:
“The averag’e weekly wage of the injured employe shall be taken as the basis upon which to compute benefits and shall be determined as follows; * * *
“(b) The total amount earned by the injured…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Central Surety & Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Industrial Commission v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
- Karoly v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
- Colorado Fuel & Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
- Mora v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. Plains Utility Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1953
- Industrial Commission v. Corwin HospitalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Coates, Reid & Waldron v. VigilSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Lindner Packing & Provision Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
- L. B. Cole Produce Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.