Legal Opinion

Vermont Mutual Insurance v. Gambell

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 2, 1997No. 96-060PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff Vermont Mutual Insurance Company appeals from an order declaring that it is obligated to provide insurance coverage to defendants Gambell and Allison under a homeowners policy issued to them by Vermont Mutual. We affirm.

Defendant Gambell operates a pet-sitting business at a house that she owns jointly with defendant Allison. In response to advertisements for the business, defendant Sleeman brought her dog to the home to be boarded while she went on vacation. Sleeman parked her vehicle in the driveway that served both the house where Gambell and Allison resided and the kennel, which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. MooreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. SippleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Gulf Insurance Company v. TilleyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1967
  4. Gulf Insurance Company v. Ronald Tilley, Carol Jo Tilley, Marcella Smith (A Minor), Patricia A. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  5. In re the Estate of PhilipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Towns v. Northern Security InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  2. Vandenberg v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Luneau v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  4. Northern Security Insurance v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  5. Armed Forces Insurance Exchange v. Transamerica Insurance Co.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API