Legal Opinion

Hagemann v. Pinska

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1931PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* [EDITORS' NOTE: FOOTNOTE * IS OMITTED FROM THE ORIGINAL COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT, THEREFORE IT IS NOT DISPLAYED IN THE ONLINE VERSION.]

1. — Judgments — Liens — Statutes. Judgment liens are purely creatures of statute, and owe their life and effect to legislation.

2. — Same — Same — Creation of Judgment Lien — Requisites. Generally, apart from consideration of statutes, the creation of a judgment lien requires that there shall be a judgment, which is final, valid, and subsisting, and rendered by a lawfully and validly constituted court, for the payment of a definite and certain sum of money,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Mansfield v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Nelson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  3. Goff v. GoffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Davis v. OwnsbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1851
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Randolph Town-Site Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Gardine v. CotteySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. McClanahan v. HawkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Harrison v. HarrisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Steckler v. StecklerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Yarus v. YarusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API