Legal Opinion

Moore v. Lewis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1959No. 174PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

The motions to set aside the orders of sale and confirmation are based on these .assertions: (1) Daniel Lewis was at all times competent to manage his affairs; hence the order appointing a guardian to .act for him was invalid, rendering all subsequent proceedings void. (2) The heirs of Willie Lewis had not been properly served with process andi, as they were necessary parties, the court was without power to direct a sale.

These motions were not verified 'by Daniel Lewis, but by one of his present attorneys: Daniel Lewis made an affidavit which recites the employment of present counsel with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tate v. . MottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Morris v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Graham v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Lovett v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Gregg v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. In Re Simmons Ex Rel. FrinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Bell v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API