In Re Simmons Ex Rel. Frink
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
Appellants propound seven questions, each of which
they say must be answered in the affirmative to sustain the judgment.
The first is: Was Hewett’s appointment as guardian invalid? They contend the record establishes the inquisition in lunacy was a nullity because notice of hearing was not served on the alleged incompetent until 4 p.m. and the hearing was had at 4:30 p.m. on the same date. This short interval of time deprived Johnson of an opportunity to prepare his defense and establish his mental competency, and because of this lack of time in which to prepare a defense, the adjudication with…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Collins v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Howard v. BoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Moore v. . GidneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
- Mercer v. MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Butler v. . WinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reverie Lingerie, Inc. v. McCainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- H. F. Mitchell Construction Co. v. Orange County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964