Legal Opinion

United States v. Gerald Ronald Guthrie, United States of America v. Albert Otis Haden

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 4, 1967No. 18-4065PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOBELOFF, Circuit Judge:

The legal sufficiency of an indictment for violating 18 U.S.C. § 912 is the primary issue raised by defendant-appellants Haden and Guthrie. That section provides :

“Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and [1] acts as such, or [2] in such pretended character demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.” 1

The evidence showed that Haden, flashing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. DebrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Cochran & Sayre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. United States v. LepowitchSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. Carrye E. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Phillip Wolfe FiersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. David C. RosserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. Derrick Cornelius Gayle, Claude Bertram HesterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Don Lyndall RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API