Legal Opinion
Acme Process Equipment Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 11, 1965No. 538-59PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge
In January 1953, plaintiff entered into two separate contracts with the Army, one for the production of elevating and traversing assemblies and the other for the manufacture of 75 mm. rifles. The present claims grow out of the termination of the former contract for the Government’s convenience.*2573 There are in effect two independent demands, one urged by the Acme Process Equipment Company as prune contractor for itself and all of its subcontractors save one, and the other on behalf of All Metals Industries, Inc., the principal subcontractor.
The contract out of which the claims arise was executed…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. WurtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Lasalle Talman Bank, F.S.B. v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Lennard L. MeadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- J. L. Simmons Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.