Legal Opinion

Krow v. Union Pacific Railroad

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1984No. 83CA0639PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEE *, Justice.

Plaintiff, Richard Krow, appeals a judgment entered on a jury verdict on plaintiff’s claim under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51, et seq. (FELA), contending that the damages awarded are inadequate. We affirm.

Plaintiff’s claim arose from an accident that occurred on March 13, 1980, when defendant’s switch engine collided with a caboose in which plaintiff, who was employed as a conductor, was sitting. Plaintiff testified that he experienced lower back pain immediately after the accident. However, he neither reported the accident nor sought medical assistance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Zerr v. TrenkleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  3. Norman Mayer v. Illinois Northern Railway, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maylie v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Giampapa v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Jones v. Union Pacific RailroadColorado Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API