Lipschutz v. Quigley
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Petition of I. L. Lipschutz against Andrew A. Quigley, Prohibition Agent, to have search warrant declared illegally issued and for return of property seized thereunder.
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
The petitioner, under a permit duly issued, is authorized to sell liquor at wholesale at premises 226 South street, Philadelphia. Upon a search warrant issued by a United States commissioner, the respondent, Andrew A. Quigley, a federal prohibition agent, seized upon the said premises 1,857 cases of wine, 249 barrels of wine, 283 cases of cordials, 425 cases of gin, and a large number of what purported to be vendees’ permits to purchase from Lipschutz by various vendees named thereon, under various dates from April, 1921, to May, 1922; also Lipschutz’s record book of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Adams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States v. KrausDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921
- Francis Drug Co. v. PotterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1921
- In re AlpernDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1922
3Cited by5 opinions
- Steckler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Daeufer-Lieberman Brewing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
- United States v. 18 Barrels of AlcoholDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1927
- General Industries Co. v. 20 Wacker Drive Bldg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- General Industries Co. v. 20 Wacker Drive Bldg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946