Legal Opinion
Perry v. Moran
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 1987No. 52944-2PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Callow, J. —
The plaintiff, Perry, Whittemore and Tanner (PWT), is a Seattle accounting firm. In 1981, the firm consisted of 4 partners, 18 or 19 staff accountants, and 25 to 30 support employees. The firm was organized into three basic departments, including the Retirement Department for which the defendant, Judith Moran, was hired.
The defendant, Moran, began her career as an accountant in Michigan in 1972, performing retirement plan work. In 1976, she left the company she was working for to start her own practice in the same area, taking a major part of her initial client base from among her…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Yeats v. Estate of YeatsWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Wood v. MayWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Faw, Casson & Co. v. CranstonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1977
- Smith, Batchelder & Rugg v. FosterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Wolf & Co. v. WaldronAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- BDO Seidman v. HirshbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Young v. VegaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
- Peat Marwick Main & Co. v. HaassTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.