Legal Opinion

Marine Bank v. Taz's Trucking Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 2005No. 2003AP2827PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶ 1. Petitioner Taz's Trucking Incorporated (Taz's) petitions for review of a published decision of the court of appeals, Marine Bank v. Taz's Trucking Inc., 2004 WI App 164, 275 Wis. 2d 711, 688 N.W.2d 730, affirming the circuit court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Marine Bank and Robert K. Steuer, Receiver (Marine Bank). Marine Bank seeks to enjoin Taz's from collecting unpaid freight charges from the consignees of Modern Building Materials Inc. (MBM). On review, we address the following questions: (1) whether there are genuine issues of material fact, or reasonable alternative…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ex Parte State of New York, No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Grams v. BossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Ventures, LLC v. GEA AssociatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Russ Ex Rel. Schwartz v. RussWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Community Development Authority v. Racine County Condemnation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  4. Apex Capital LP v. Carnival Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Metropolitan Ventures, LLC v. GEA AssociatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API