Legal Opinion

State v. Hanson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 16, 1990No. 23659-8-IPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtForrest, J.

— Sharon Hanson appeals from her conviction of murder in the second degree, contending that the court erred in excluding testimony regarding the battered woman syndrome. We affirm.

Hanson and Mel Cochran had a stormy relationship, which frequently resulted in the police being summoned. During these confrontations, Hanson testified that Cochran had pinned her against a wall, had threatened to injure her, and had struck her.

On March 7, 1988, Hanson and Cochran quarreled about Cochran's share of their living expenses. Hanson testified that Cochran became angry and that she became frightened. She…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ibn-Tamas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. State v. AlleryWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. CiskieWashington Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BrightmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. BrightmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. RikerWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Pueblo v. González RománSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1992
  5. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API