Legal Opinion

Reich v. . Triplett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeicsoN, J.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, and at the close of all the evidence, the defendants made motions in the court below for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below overruled these motions, and in this we see no error.

The question involved: Did the plaintiff, who had a lien for repairs, under C. S., 2435, and the common law, lose his lien as against the defendants, who claim under a prior recorded mortgage, when he was induced to part with his possession by false and fraudulent representations of the owner? ¥e think not.

C. S., 2435, in part, is as follows: “Any mechanic…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. YatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. McDougall v. . CraponSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. Block v. . DowdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. Tedder v. Wilmington & Weldon R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  5. Glazener v. Gloucester Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Adder v. Holman & Moody, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Barbre-Askew Finance, Inc. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Frost Motor Co. v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  4. In re the Duplan Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  5. Willis v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API