Legal Opinion

Glazener v. Gloucester Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 9, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs Glazener and Eisber in No. 525, and by Lumber Company et als. in No. 526, at April Term, 1914, of TkaNsylvaNIA, from Cline, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Clakk, 0. J.

Tbis was an action brought by E. A. Glazener, Jack Fisher, and 0. P. Hogsed, separately, to enforce a laborer’s lien, and tried together by consent. Judgment below was entered against Glaze-ner and Fisher, from which they appealed, and in favor of 0. P. Hog-sed, from which the defendants appealed.

By consent, the court found the facts, which are as follows: The defendant lumber company entered into a contract with Donald Campbell under which he took over the band sawmill and all attachments, the railroad for hauling out logs, and entire rolling stock and certain sections of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDougall v. . CraponSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  2. Block v. . DowdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. Tedder v. Wilmington & Weldon R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Twin City Motor Co. v. Rouzer Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Reich v. . TriplettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Barbre-Askew Finance, Inc. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API