Legal Opinion

Willis v. . Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

Is a mechanic’s lien for work done on an automobile by the procurement of the second mortgagee or lien holder, superior to the rights of the first mortgagee?

No point is made as to whether W. R. Willis, the mortgagor, was in default upon his payments on the first mortgage, payable to his brother, B. G. Willis, the plaintiff in this action. The car was in the possession of the mortgagor apparently with the consent and approval of the holders of both the first and second liens. Upon this state of facts the defendants contend that by virtue of provisions of O. S., 2435, the mechanic’s lien for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harris v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Twin City Motor Co. v. Rouzer Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Johnson v. . YatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Reich v. . TriplettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Sales Co. v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barbre-Askew Finance, Inc. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Briley v. Donald Knudtson ImplementNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API