Legal Opinion

City of Waco v. McCraw

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1936No. 7073PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Critz

This is an original mandamus proceeding instituted in this Court by the City of Waco, Texas, against the Honorable William McCraw, Attorney General of Texas, to compel the approval of an issue of $41,000.00 of revenue bonds of such City. The case is submitted on an agreed statement of facts. Only law questions are involved. We shall not attempt to detail all of the facts. It is sufficient to say that all proceedings relative to the issuance of these bonds were regular, and they are entitled to be approved, unless they are illegal for some of the reasons we shall discuss.

It appears that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Federal Crude Oil Co. v. Yount-Lee Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Lower Colorado River Authority v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Lewis v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. City of Dayton v. AllredTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  5. City of Houston v. AllredTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Interstate Power Co. v. Town of McGregorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  3. Scroggins v. City of HarlingenTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Wilkes-Barre AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Asa S. Agar, Inc. v. Texas UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API