Ferrari S.P.A. Esercizio Fabriche Automobili E Corse v. Carl Roberts, D/B/A Roberts Motor Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, Circuit Judge.
This is a trademark infringement action brought pursuant to the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq. The principal issue is whether the district court correctly concluded that plaintiff Ferrari enjoyed unregistered trademark protection in the exterior shape and appearance of two of its automobiles and, if so, whether defendant Roberts’ replicas of Ferrari’s designs infringed that protection, in violation of section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. More narrowly focused, the issues are:
—Whether Ferrari’s automobile designs have acquired secondary meaning;
—Whether there is a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Amstar Corporation v. Domino's Pizza, Inc. And Atlanta Pizza, Inc., Pizza Enterprises, Inc. And Pizza Services, Inc., Hanna Creative Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Daddy's Junky Music Stores, Inc. v. Big Daddy's Family Music CenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Midwest Industries, Inc. v. Karavan Trailers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. v. American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Am General Corporation and General Motors Corporation v. Daimlerchrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.