Legal Opinion
DeSoto v. Smith
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 1, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
891 A.2d 1241 (2006)
383 N.J. Super. 384
Karen DeSOTO, Corporation Counsel for the City of Jersey City, Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
Harvey SMITH and the City of Jersey City, Defendants/Respondents.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued Telephonically February 1, 2006.
Decided March 1, 2006.
Karen F. DeSoto argued the cause pro se.
Stephen J. Edelstein, Florham Park, argued the cause for respondent (Schwartz Simon Edelstein Celso & Kessler, attorneys; Mr. Edelstein, of counsel; Mr. Edelstein, Denis G. Murphy and Jason J. Lavery, on the brief).
Before Judges KESTIN, LEFELT, and SELTZER.
The…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Nicoletta v. North Jersey District Water Supply CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Casamasino v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Armano v. MartinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- John Armano, Jr. v. Michele MartinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Stomel v. City of CamdenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006