Legal Opinion

Stomel v. City of Camden

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 10, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

893 A.2d 32 (2006)

383 N.J. Super. 615

Elliot S. STOMEL, Esquire, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-respondent,

v.

The CITY OF CAMDEN, Gwendolyn Faison, The Camden City Council, Defendants-Respondents/Cross-appellants.

Mayor Milton Milan, Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 1, 2006.

Decided March 10, 2006.

Alan H. Schorr argued the cause, Cherry Hill, for appellant/cross-respondent.

Cheryl L. Cooper argued the cause, Woodbury, for respondents/cross-appellants, City of Camden, Gwendolyn Faison, and Camden City Council (Holston, Mac-Donald, Uzdavinis, Eastlack & Ziegler,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stomel v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  2. Leonides Velazquez v. City of Camden and Officer Alexis RamosNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
  3. Citizens for Ref. v. Citizens for Open Gov.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Stomel v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API