Legal Opinion

Great Plains Insurance Co., Inc. v. Angerman

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1991No. 90CA1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CRISWELL.

In this declaratory judgment action instituted by plaintiff, Great Plains Insurance Co. (Great Plains), the trial court granted summary judgment to it after concluding that it was not liable under either of two insurance policies issued by it to pay personal injury protection (PIP) benefits to defendant, Patrick Angerman. Defendant’s appeal requires us to consider whether defendant’s injuries arose out of the “use” of a motor vehicle under the Colorado Auto Accidents Reparation Act, § 10-4-701, et seq., C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Yol. 4A) (the Act). Since we conclude that such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Kohl v. Union Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. United States Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. People v. Wheatridge Poker ClubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  5. Hopkins v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Professional Affiliates Co. v. Farmers Insurance GroupColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Nesjan v. J & A Distributing, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. Grulke v. EricksonColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API