Hardtke v. Exide Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, Andrew C. Hardtke (“Hardtke”), brought this action against his former employer, the defendant, Exide Corporation (“Exide”) for separation pay under Exide’s “Separation Payment Policy For Salaried Employees” (“Separation Plan”). In the spring of 1984, a company known as the Richardson Division (“Richardson”) of 'the Witco Corporation entered into an agreement with Exide to purchase Exide’s Stokes Molded Products Division (“Stokes”). On or about December 14, 1984, Hardtke was denied separation pay on the grounds that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- York v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pane v. RCA Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barto Technical Services, Inc. v. Persons Listed on Exhibit A-I of the Objection (In Re Wean Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Barto Technical Services, Inc. v. Persons Listed on Exhibit A-I of the Objection (In Re Wean Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Arber v. Equitable Beneficial Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995