Legal Opinion
Ertl v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 15, 2022No. 0:21-cv-01493Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Vincent J. Ertl, Case No. 21-cv-1493 (WMW/DTS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Defendant. Before the Court is Defendant Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s (ADM) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Vincent J. Ertl’s complaint for failure to state a claim. (Dkt. 6.) For the reasons addressed below, ADM’s motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND Ertl is a 66-year-old resident of Minnesota who worked at ADM and its predecessor company from 1995 until June 2020. ADM is a Delaware corporation, headquartered in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Denise Blomker v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.