Legal Opinion

Wiedeman v. Howell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 2, 1955No. 10295PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHER, Chief Justice.

This suit was brought by F. W. Howell, C. H. Cox, Jr., and James C. Moore, hereinafter called appellees, against A. E. Wiedeman, hereinafter called appellant, seeking an injunction prohibiting appellant from practicing medicine within ten miles of the City of Temple, Bell County, Texas, until May 31, 1960. Appellant had formerly been in partnership with two of the ap-pellees, Howell and Cox, in the practice of medicine in Temple under the name of Temple Medical Clinic, and the three men, together with their wives, were the sole stockholders of a corporation which owned…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones & Carey v. RisleyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Terrell, Atkins Harvin v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Universal Credit Co. v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Bonzer v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Panhandle Refining Co. v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCallum Highlands, Ltd. v. Washington Capital Dus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. The Texas Pacific Coal and Oil Company v. Honolulu Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. Honolulu Oil Corp. v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API