Legal Opinion

Honolulu Oil Corp. v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided March 31, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 1766PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLEY, District Judge.

The plaintiff Honolulu Oil Corporation has sued the defendant Texas Pacific Coal and Oil Company for an adjudication adversely to the defendant’s claim of an overriding royalty interest originating in the assignment of a certain oil and gas lease, which terminated when a well begun by the assignee within, but completed after, the primary term, as extended by such operations, proved to be a dry hole, it being the defendant’s position that under the special language of said overriding royalty reservation same has now attached to new leases acquired by said assignee of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jones & Carey v. RisleyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Thornburgh v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Bonzer v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Witherspoon v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Gordon v. Empire Gas & Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jerome S. Murray v. Irving S. LichtmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  2. The Texas Pacific Coal and Oil Company v. Honolulu Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API