Legal Opinion

Appeal of Stanak & Mulvaney

Vermont Superior Court

Decided February 28, 2002No. 101-7-01 VtecPublished

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT In re: Appeal of Edward Stanak } and Joellen Mulvaney } } Docket No. 101-7-01 Vtec } } Decision and Order on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment Appellants appealed from a decision of the Development Review Board (DRB) of the City of Barre granting to Appellee-Applicant Independent Wireless One Leased Realty conditional use approval and site plan approval to install wireless communications equipment on the North Barre Manor building. Appellants are represented by Paul S. Gillies, Esq.; Appellee-Applicants are represented by Craig Weatherly, Esq., and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Town of Amherst v. Omnipoint Communications Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  2. At & T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. City Council of Virginia BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  3. 360° Communications Co. v. Board of Supervisors of Albemarle CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  4. Virginia Metronet, Inc. v. BD. OF SUPERVISORS OF JAMES CITY CTY., VIRGINIADistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
  5. Omnipoint Communication, Inc. v. Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API