Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Mercantile National Bank
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 8, 1979No. 77-1780PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MAROVITZ, Senior District Judge.
Motion to Vacate, Motion to Compel Discovery, and Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoena and for a Protective Order
This action, commenced by Drovers National Bank of Chicago (Drovers), is *347brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1337. Plaintiff alleges, inter alia, that defendants engaged in deceptive conduct violative of the federal securities laws in connection with a participation agreement (the “agreement”) between Drovers and defendant Mercantile National Bank of Chicago (Mercantile). Pursuant to the agreement, Drovers reimbursed Mercantile…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.) Inc. v. Puerto Rico Water Resources AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1978
- Dorfman v. RombsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wm. T. Thompson Co. v. General Nutrition Corp., Inc. General Nutrition Corporation and General Nutrition Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- In the Matter of International Horizons, Inc., Debtor. International Horizons, Inc., and Touche Ross & Company v. The Committee of Unsecured CreditorsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Pittsburgh v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- King v. E.F. Hutton & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- Independent Petrochemical Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.