Legal Opinion
Independent Petrochemical Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 15, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 83-3347PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ARTHUR L. BURNETT, Sr., United States Magistrate.
Before the United States Magistrate is the motion of Insurance Company of North America (INA) to compel production of seven (7) letters from counsel for Independent Petrochemical Corporation to Peat, Mar-wick, Mitchell & Co. (hereafter Peat, Mar-wick), an accountant firm, pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. INA asserts that the plaintiffs have erroneously refused to allow the production of these documents on the asserted ground that they are covered by the accountant-client and attorney-client…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HeaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Stout v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1993
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- In re Raytheon Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Hercules, Inc. v. Martin Marietta Corp.District Court, D. Utah · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.