Legal Opinion

Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Starkey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 4, 1995No. C5-94-876PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Respondent, Patsy Starkey, was injured while a passenger in a vehicle owned and operated by Frank H. Starkey, her father-in-law, when it was involved in a two-car accident. The driver of the other vehicle, Marjorie Erickson, was insured with a policy providing $100,000 per person and $300,000 per accident liability coverage. Patsy Starkey had uninsured motorist (UM) coverage under a Dairyland Insurance Company (Dairyland) policy which provided limits of $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident.

Patsy Starkey and her husband brought a suit against Erickson for Starkey’s injuries;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Frey Ex Rel. Frey v. SnelgroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Brunmeier v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Christensen v. EggenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Dohney v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Koehnen v. DufuorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Miklas v. ParrottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Gusk v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API